I would generally agree in the event of paying lip service to social problems without also placing support and money to advocate for change or implementing it to the company and their job in the very least. Having said that police brutality is not exactly something that a company like EA throwing cash at the problem does considerably towards fixing. At best they put money towards the lawyers and groups that fight to see justice after the truth or lobby to have laws changed that at the present government won't. It has systemic difficulties within police of not reporting their own and holding them liable rather staying silent and with the Mut 21 coins authorities unions that allow it all to occur or in a sense even promote it by the repercussions being a slap on the wrist followed by being hired in another precinct showing them there's no consequences. Before even getting to legislation and rulings like qualified immunity that shield abusive cops and allow them to abuse their power . The majority of which EA and most capitalist businesses are not able to do all that much about making it unfair to say they are in the best possible position to do much more.
The ones in the best possible position to do more would be the assumed great cops by no longer staying quiet and enabling bad cops to eliminate their misuse of power or voting for better leadership for their marriages that won't enable the behaviour. But of course it is just words. Businesses will only ever do these things once public opinion has turned into one way. Even if all corporations stopped doing things wrong, it'll take a long, long time for this picture of corporate America to reduce its tarnish. Part of what people might do is elect politicians who promise they'll hold these corporations accountable. It probably wont happen alone. This could be much easier if a person like that may run for office successfully.
Because regardless of this sentiment, this is still 100 percent a company and marketing maneuver. If they really wanted to do something positive, they could do it without advertising their products while doing this. Because it is not genuine. This is no different than the coronavirus advertisements. They could have said nothing at all. That is good. Solidarity or they realize a nice chunk of the audience is preoccupied with something more important than a damn videogame? Man. These remarks really emphasize the nihilistic nature of reddit users. Yes, this really is a provider. Yes, it has something to do with advertising. But Jesus, can not we be glad that firms are stating something? Do you not understand how much of an impact this could create? In the event the firm ignored the circumstance, it would give every checked out thoughts the concept that what's happening is ordinary and regular.
EA doesn't care about people that aren't investors. Eliminating Kaepernick's title from songs in Madden 2 years in a row shows it. Businesses do not need one to defend them, let their lawyers do that work. I'm all for calling a spade a spade and being happy when I'm surprised by something like this. But we should not praise a company for attaining the absolute bare minimum. We ought to praise companies who reveal patterns of pleasure. Feel free to disagree, but don't act like this exact instance is this incredibly complicated morally-grey situation. I mean I believed there were pretty strict regulations whose names and likeliness can be utilised in Madden. Just like Belicheck and Payton aren't in Madden since they are not a part of the NFLCA and that is who EA has a contract with. They might need to pay Kap if his title is utilized and are probably avoiding that. That and Kap is not just welcome in the buy Madden nfl 21 coins NFL planet (not speaking about fans) anymore.